Yes News

Welcome to the world of Yes News ( The Authentic News Publishers from India)

“PM Criticizes Congress Over ‘Emergency’ During Parliament Session; M. Kharge Responds on NEET”

“PM Criticizes Congress Over ‘Emergency’ During Parliament Session; M. Kharge Responds on NEET”

As the Indian Parliament convened for a crucial session, the political arena was electrified by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s sharp criticism aimed at the Congress party, invoking the dark chapter of the Emergency imposed in 1975. The Prime Minister’s remarks, highlighting the Emergency period as a stark reminder of authoritarianism and political suppression, set the tone for a contentious session. In response, Mallikarjun Kharge, the veteran Congress leader, countered vigorously, focusing on the contentious issue of NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test) and its implications for medical education in the country.

Historical Context and Political Significance

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s invocation of the Emergency, a period marked by the suspension of civil liberties and widespread political repression under the leadership of then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, carries profound historical weight in Indian politics. The Emergency, declared on June 25, 1975, lasted until March 21, 1977, and remains a contentious topic that polarizes opinions across the political spectrum.

By referencing the Emergency during the parliamentary session, Prime Minister Modi aimed to underscore the importance of democratic values, freedom of speech, and the need for responsible governance. His remarks were not merely a historical reflection but also a strategic move to critique the Congress party’s past actions while emphasizing the Bharatiya Janata Party’s commitment to upholding democratic principles.

PM Modi’s Critique and Political Messaging

During his address, Prime Minister Modi highlighted the stark contrast between the present government’s approach and the authoritarian tendencies exhibited during the Emergency era. He emphasized the importance of safeguarding democratic institutions and individual freedoms, framing his government as a champion of transparency, accountability, and inclusive governance.

The Prime Minister’s critique of the Congress party’s historical record resonates deeply in contemporary Indian politics, where narratives of governance, accountability, and political stewardship are fiercely debated. By invoking the Emergency, Prime Minister Modi sought to galvanize support for his party while questioning the Congress party’s commitment to democratic norms.

Congress Party’s Response: M. Kharge on NEET

In response to Prime Minister Modi’s remarks on the Emergency, Mallikarjun Kharge, a senior Congress leader, redirected the focus towards the contentious issue of NEET. NEET, a standardized entrance examination for medical courses in India, has been a topic of heated debate due to its implications for students and the educational landscape.

M. Kharge’s intervention during the parliamentary session underscored the Congress party’s stance on NEET, advocating for reforms and amendments to address the concerns raised by students, parents, and educational stakeholders. He articulated the Congress party’s position on the need for a more inclusive and equitable education system, challenging the government’s approach to standardized testing and its impact on medical aspirants.

NEET: Controversies and Policy Debates

NEET, introduced in 2013 by the Medical Council of India (MCI) and subsequently mandated by the Supreme Court of India, aims to standardize the admissions process for medical courses across the country. However, the examination has faced criticism on various fronts, including issues of accessibility, syllabus disparities, and the psychological burden on students.

Critics argue that NEET exacerbates educational inequalities by favoring students from affluent urban backgrounds with access to coaching centers and resources. Moreover, concerns have been raised about the correlation between NEET scores and socioeconomic status, potentially disadvantaging students from marginalized communities.

Congress Party’s Advocacy and Policy Recommendations

Mallikarjun Kharge’s advocacy during the parliamentary session centered on the Congress party’s commitment to addressing these challenges through legislative reforms and policy interventions. He emphasized the need for a comprehensive review of the NEET examination process, incorporating diverse perspectives from educational experts, stakeholders, and affected communities.

The Congress party’s stance on NEET reflects broader concerns within the educational sector regarding equity, accessibility, and the quality of medical education in India. By highlighting these issues, M. Kharge sought to galvanize support for legislative initiatives aimed at reforming the examination framework and promoting a more inclusive educational environment.

Political Implications and Future Directions

The exchange between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Mallikarjun Kharge during the parliamentary session underscores the dynamic nature of Indian politics, characterized by ideological debates, policy disagreements, and strategic messaging. The Prime Minister’s critique of the Emergency era and the Congress party’s response on NEET illustrate contrasting priorities and visions for governance and societal development.

As the political discourse continues to evolve, the debates surrounding democratic values, educational reforms, and governance priorities are likely to shape public discourse and electoral dynamics. The interaction between the ruling party and the opposition in Parliament serves as a barometer of national sentiment and political alignment, influencing policy outcomes and public perceptions.


The parliamentary session, marked by Prime Minister Modi’s critique of the Emergency and Mallikarjun Kharge’s response on NEET, encapsulates the multifaceted nature of Indian democracy. The intersection of historical narratives, policy debates, and political strategies underscores the complexity of governance in a diverse and vibrant democracy like India.

As the nation navigates through these contentious issues, the role of Parliament in deliberating on crucial matters of national importance remains pivotal. The exchange between leaders from different political perspectives reflects the democratic ethos of dialogue, dissent, and deliberation, shaping the contours of India’s political landscape.

In the coming days, the repercussions of this parliamentary session are likely to reverberate across political corridors, public forums, and policy arenas, influencing public opinion and shaping the trajectory of governance in India.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top